This is a sample report for a fictional deck. Yours runs on your own slides — free score first, full report for $7.
Grade my deckSharp Score Report · sharpdecks.com
Meridian Foods — Private Label Expansion
Prepared by Sharp · 9 slides
61 /100
The analysis is solid but the deck makes the board dig for it: five titles are topic labels, the $14M recommendation first appears on slide 6, and there is no executive summary. Rewrite the title spine point-first and this is a strong deck — the evidence is already there.
Titles open as topics; the recommendation surfaces at slide 6 with no early signpost.
No executive summary on a 9-slide deck; roadmap and risks sections overlap.
Formatting flags: 1 wall of text.
2 of 8 content slides fail the so-what audit; the body fully proves the title on 4.
3 of 8 content titles are full-sentence takeaways.
5 fixes found: 1 error, 4 consistency issues.
Rewritten storyline
Your titles, rewritten point-first
- 01
Meridian Foods: Category Review
Premium private label is Meridian's next $14M growth lever
- 02
Background
Category growth has shifted to premium private label since 2023
- 03
Private label share grew 6 points since 2023, led by premium tierskept as is
- 04
Market Analysis
Premium tiers now drive most category margin growth [needs supporting data]
- 05
Recommendationkept as is
- 06
Entering premium private label adds $14M revenue by 2027kept as is
- 07
Implementation Roadmap
A three-phase entry starting Q1 reaches shelf by September
- 08
Risks & Mitigations
Slotting-fee exposure is the main risk, capped by a staged rollout
- 09
We ask the board to approve a $2.5M pilot in Q1kept as is
Prioritized fixes
- 1
Rewrite the five topic-label titles point-first
The board reads titles first; right now the titles carry none of the argument.(slides 1, 2, 4, 7, 8)
- 2
Add an executive summary slide stating the $14M opportunity and the $2.5M ask
Nine slides with no summary forces the reader to assemble the case themselves.(slide 1)
- 3
State the implication on Market Analysis
It holds the deck's strongest data and currently makes no point with it.(slide 4)
- 4
Rebuild Risks & Mitigations so each risk maps to a named mitigation
Mismatched risk and mitigation lists read as unexamined boilerplate.(slide 8)
- 5
Standardize number formatting deck-wide
Mixed formats make carefully built numbers look careless.(slides 3, 6)
Per-slide scorecard
Click a slide to see its scores and issues.
| # | Title | S | H | A | R | P | Polish | So-what | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meridian Foods: Category Review | 62 | 45 | 95 | 88 | 38 | 95 | Pass | Title states the company name, not the message · Open with the answer: the board should know the ask from slide 1 |
| 2 | Background | 62 | 45 | 95 | 45 | 38 | 78 | Fail | Topic label carries no message · Facts are listed without an implication for Meridian |
| 3 | Private label share grew 6 points since 2023, led by premium tiers | 62 | 45 | 95 | 88 | 92 | 78 | Pass | Number formatting inconsistent with the rest of the deck |
| 4 | Market Analysis | 62 | 45 | 70 | 45 | 38 | 78 | Fail | Three data tables with no stated so-what · 104 words on one slide — split or cut · Title is a section label, not a finding |
| 5 | Recommendation | 62 | 45 | 95 | 85 | 85 | 95 | Pass | |
| 6 | Entering premium private label adds $14M revenue by 2027 | 62 | 45 | 95 | 88 | 92 | 78 | Pass | State the margin assumption behind the $14M on the slide |
| 7 | Implementation Roadmap | 62 | 45 | 95 | 45 | 38 | 78 | Fail | Topic label where a commitment belongs · Activities listed without the outcome they produce |
| 8 | Risks & Mitigations | 62 | 45 | 95 | 32 | 38 | 78 | Pass | Body lists generic risks that don't match the named mitigations · Quantify the slotting-fee exposure — the number exists in slide 4's data |
| 9 | We ask the board to approve a $2.5M pilot in Q1 | 62 | 45 | 95 | 88 | 92 | 95 | Pass |
Grammar and polish
- S02the category have showed steady growththe category has shown steady growth
- S03twenty-three percent23%
- S06FY272027 — match the format used elsewhere
- S07Kick-offKickoff
- S08mitigations Planmitigations plan
Executive summary
This deck has no executive summary. The deck opens on a title slide and walks evidence-first; the recommendation arrives on slide 6 unannounced.
Premium private label is the category's growth engine, up 6 share points since 2023. Meridian can capture $14M of annual revenue by 2027 by entering premium tiers, where margins outrun branded equivalents. A staged, three-phase entry caps slotting-fee exposure and reaches shelf by September. We ask the board to approve a $2.5M pilot in Q1.
Audience and ask
Inferred audience
Meridian Foods board of directors
Ask clarity
clear
Note
The ask lands cleanly on the final slide; signpost it on slide 1 so the board reads the evidence already knowing the decision in front of them.
This took 60 seconds and a .pptx.
Free composite score and dimension breakdown on upload. The full report — everything above — is $7.
Grade my deck